Informative Demonstrative Speech
Credible
Articles with Explanation:
1. Coppola, F., & Spector, D. (2009). Natural stress
relief meditation as a tool for reducing anxiety and increasing
self-actualization. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal,
37(3), 307–311. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/sbp/sbp/2009/00000037/00000003/art00003
This peer-reviewed research article presents a study on
Natural Stress Relief (NSR) Meditation, demonstrating its positive effects on
reducing trait anxiety and enhancing self-actualization. The article provides
statistical evidence using psychometric tools like the STAI and SISA, making it
highly credible and relevant for an informative speech about stress relief
techniques.
2. Kassymova, K., Kosherbayeva, N., Sangilbayev, S.,
& Schachl, H. (2018). Stress management techniques for students. In
Proceedings of the International Conference on the Theory and Practice of
Personality Formation in Modern Society (ICTPPFMS 2018). Atlantis Press.
https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ictppfms-18/25902973
This open-access paper discusses biological and practical
aspects of stress in student populations, and presents accessible,
evidence-based techniques such as yoga pranayama and Japanese finger methods.
It is credible due to its conference-based publication and thorough literature
review, directly supporting a demonstration speech aimed at student well-being.
3. Lehrer, P. M. (1996). Varieties of relaxation methods
and their unique effects. International Journal of Stress Management, 3, 1–15.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01857884
This literature review explores the physiological and
psychological effects of various relaxation techniques, highlighting their
unique impacts depending on method type (e.g., progressive vs. autogenic
relaxation). It is published in a recognized stress management journal,
providing scholarly insight that strengthens an informative speech on different
ways to achieve relaxation.
Non-Credible
Sources with Explanation:
Wikipedia.org: Open-edit platform without academic peer
review; reliability varies.
Buzzfeed.com: Primarily entertainment-based and lacks
scholarly rigor.
Quora.com: Crowdsourced opinions without citation or
expert validation.
Medium.com (unsourced articles): Often opinion-driven,
lacking peer-reviewed backing.
Personal Blogs: Subjective experiences without scientific
support or formal references.